Conflict of Interest Policy

SPM Development Services Limited Conflict of Interest Policy September 2026

Reviewed and Updated: September 2026
Next Review: September 2027, or sooner if awarding organisation requirements, statutory guidance or SPM’s circumstances change.
Approved by: Simon Piper-Masha

Related Policies and Procedures:

Assessment Policy (2026)
Quality Assurance and Review Policy (2026)
Malpractice and Maladministration Policy (2026)
Fair Assessment Appeals Procedure (2026)
Safer Recruitment Policy (2026)
Safeguarding and Child Protection Policy (2026)
Whistleblowing Policy (2026)

Purpose

This policy explains how SPM Development Services Ltd identifies, records and manages actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest.
SPM is committed to ensuring that decisions are fair, impartial and not improperly influenced by personal, professional, financial or other interests.
SPM will comply with current OCN London requirements and notify OCN London promptly where a conflict may affect the delivery, assessment, internal quality assurance or certification of a qualification.

Scope

This policy applies to the Head of Centre, staff, self-employed tutors, mentors, assessors, Internal Quality Assurers, contractors, consultants and anyone else acting on behalf of SPM.
It covers all areas of SPM’s work, including:

Definition

A conflict of interest arises where a person’s personal, professional, financial or other interests could influence, or could reasonably be seen to influence, their judgement or actions when carrying out work for SPM.
A conflict may be:
A conflict is not automatically wrongdoing. It must, however, be disclosed promptly so that it can be assessed and managed.

Examples of Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts may include:
This list is not exhaustive. Anyone who is unsure must disclose the circumstances rather than decide for themselves that no conflict exists.

Responsibilities

The Head of Centre has overall responsibility for ensuring that conflicts of interest are identified, recorded and managed appropriately.
The Head of Centre will:
A disclosure should include:
Disclosures must be made to the Head of Centre.
Where the conflict concerns the Head of Centre, it must be referred to a suitably independent person or, where relevant, directly to OCN London or the commissioning authority.

Assessment and Internal Quality Assurance

Assessment and internal quality assurance decisions must be fair, independent and based on evidence.
An assessor must not assess a learner where a personal or financial relationship could affect, or reasonably be perceived to affect, the assessment decision unless appropriate safeguards have been agreed and recorded.
An Internal Quality Assurer must not internally quality assure their own assessment decisions. Where a person acts as both assessor and IQA within SPM, another suitably competent person must carry out the required independent quality assurance of that person’s assessment decisions.
Any conflict affecting assessment, learner evidence, reasonable adjustments, achievement or certification must be reported immediately to the IQA and Head of Centre.
Learner results or certification claims must not be submitted until the conflict has been reviewed and any necessary independent checks have been completed.

Managing Conflicts of Interest

The Head of Centre will assess each disclosed conflict and decide whether it can be avoided or managed.
Possible actions may include:
The action taken must be proportionate to the nature and level of risk.

Conflict of Interest Register

SPM will maintain a secure conflict of interest register.
The register will record:
The register will be reviewed regularly and whenever circumstances change.

Notification to OCN London and Other Organisations

SPM will notify OCN London promptly where a conflict of interest:
SPM will follow any instructions given by OCN London and will not take action that could prejudice an awarding organisation investigation.
Relevant commissioning authorities, examination centres or other organisations will also be informed where required.

Safeguarding

A conflict involving a safeguarding concern, professional boundary, relationship with a learner or decision about a child or young person must be reported immediately to the Designated Safeguarding Lead.
Safeguarding action must not be delayed while a conflict of interest is considered.
Where the Designated Safeguarding Lead has a conflict, the matter must be referred through the alternative reporting arrangements in SPM’s Safeguarding and Child Protection Policy.
Conflicts involving allegations about someone working with children will be managed in accordance with SPM’s safeguarding procedures and current statutory guidance.

Confidentiality and Data Protection

Information about conflicts of interest will be handled sensitively and shared only with those who need it to assess or manage the conflict or meet legal, safeguarding, commissioning or awarding organisation requirements.
Records will be stored securely in accordance with SPM’s Privacy and Data Protection Policy.

Failure to Declare a Conflict

Failure to disclose a relevant conflict, providing misleading information or failing to follow agreed management arrangements may be treated as misconduct, a breach of contract, malpractice or maladministration.
SPM will take proportionate action and notify OCN London or another relevant organisation where required.

Complaints and Whistleblowing

Concerns about an undisclosed or poorly managed conflict may be raised with the Head of Centre.
A personal complaint may be made under SPM’s Complaints Policy and Procedure.
Concerns about wrongdoing that the person reasonably believes to be in the public interest may be raised under SPM’s Whistleblowing Policy.
No one will be disadvantaged for raising a genuine concern.

Monitoring and Review

The Head of Centre will monitor declared conflicts and ensure that agreed actions remain effective.
The IQA will review conflicts affecting assessment and quality assurance as part of SPM’s annual quality assurance arrangements.
This policy will be reviewed annually, or sooner if a conflict arises, an incident identifies a weakness or awarding organisation or statutory requirements change.